I didn't pay attention to this in the first place because I saw no reason for a change about the .LOCAL new gTLD.
The .LOCAL new gTLD...
...is definitely one of the best strings to submit an application for anyone wanting to promote local content with domain names ending in ".local" (instead of ".com").
Can you submit an application for .LOCAL ?
I read it twice and compared both versions of the two applicant guidebook: version 2012 (page 60 & 61) and version 2026 (page 191 & 192) to understand why the .LOCAL new gTLD (and a few others) had disappeared from the list of Blocked Names from the 2026 Applicant Guidebook.
I noticed a few strings were missing form the list of Blocked Names and wondered: "How is it possible that I did not notice this?"
Reality came back knocking at my door when I read that paragraph about Special-Use Domain Names :
"Special-Use Domain Names: These are specific strings reserved by technical standards for purposes inconsistent with delegation, as explicitly noted on IANA’s Special-Use Domain Names Registry.245,246,247".
Special-Use Domain Names are specific strings reserved by technical standards for purposes inconsistent with delegation and when you click on the 245 hyperlink, it shows a few more strings that you cannot submit an application for. "Local" (and a few others) is in that list.







